Experiments and fun with the Linux disk cache
Hopefully you are now convinced that Linux didn't just eat your ram. Here are some interesting things you can do to learn how the disk cache works. If u have any questions just comment below and will be replied soon.Effects of disk cache on application memory allocation
Since I've already promised that disk cache doesn't prevent applications from getting the memory they want, let's start with that. Here is a C app (munch.c) that gobbles up as much memory as it can, or to a specified limit:#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
int max = -1;
int mb = 0;
char* buffer;
if(argc > 1)
max = atoi(argv[1]);
while((buffer=malloc(1024*1024)) != NULL && mb != max) {
memset(buffer, 0, 1024*1024);
mb++;
printf("Allocated %d MB\n", mb);
}
return 0;
}
Running out of memory isn't fun, but the OOM killer should end just this process and hopefully the rest will remain undisturbed. We'll definitely want to disable swap for this, or the app will gobble up that as well.$ sudo swapoff -a
$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 1490 14 0 24 809
-/+ buffers/cache: 656 848
Swap: 0 0 0
$ gcc munch.c -o munch
$ ./munch
Allocated 1 MB
Allocated 2 MB
(...)
Allocated 877 MB
Allocated 878 MB
Allocated 879 MB
Killed
$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 650 854 0 1 67
-/+ buffers/cache: 581 923
Swap: 0 0 0
$
Even though it said 14MB "free", that didn't stop the application from grabbing 879MB. Afterwards, the cache is pretty empty2, but it will gradually fill up again as files are read and written. Give it a try.Effects of disk cache on swapping
I also said that disk cache won't cause applications to use swap. Let's try that as well, with the same 'munch' app as in the last experiment. This time we'll run it with swap on, and limit it to a few hundred megabytes:$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 1490 14 0 10 874
-/+ buffers/cache: 605 899
Swap: 2047 6 2041
$ ./munch 400
Allocated 1 MB
Allocated 2 MB
(...)
Allocated 399 MB
Allocated 400 MB
$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 1090 414 0 5 485
-/+ buffers/cache: 598 906
Swap: 2047 6 2041
munch ate 400MB of ram, which was taken from the disk cache without resorting to swap. Likewise, we can fill the disk cache again and it will not start eating swap either. If you run watch free -m in one terminal, and find . -type f -exec cat {} + > /dev/null in another, you can see that "cached" will rise while "free" falls. After a while, it tapers off but swap is never touched1Clearing the disk cache
For experimentation, it's very convenient to be able to drop the disk cache. For this, we can use the special file/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches. By writing 3 to it, we can clear most of the disk cache:$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 1471 33 0 36 801
-/+ buffers/cache: 633 871
Swap: 2047 6 2041
$ echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
3
$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 763 741 0 0 134
-/+ buffers/cache: 629 875
Swap: 2047 6 2041
Notice how "buffers" and "cached" went down, free mem went up, and free+buffers/cache stayed the same.Effects of disk cache on load times
Let's make two test programs, one in Python and one in Java. Python and Java both come with pretty big runtimes, which have to be loaded in order to run the application. This is a perfect scenario for disk cache to work its magic.$ cat hello.py
print "Hello World! Love, Python"
$ cat Hello.java
class Hello {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
System.out.println("Hello World! Regards, Java");
}
}
$ javac Hello.java
$ python hello.py
Hello World! Love, Python
$ java Hello
Hello World! Regards, Java
$
Our hello world apps work. Now let's drop the disk cache, and see how long it takes to run them.$ echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches 3 $ time python hello.py Hello World! Love, Python real 0m1.026s user 0m0.020s sys 0m0.020s $ time java Hello Hello World! Regards, Java real 0m2.174s user 0m0.100s sys 0m0.056s $Wow. 1 second for Python, and 2 seconds for Java? That's a lot just to say hello. However, now all the file required to run them will be in the disk cache so they can be fetched straight from memory. Let's try again:
$ time python hello.py Hello World! Love, Python real 0m0.022s user 0m0.016s sys 0m0.008s $ time java Hello Hello World! Regards, Java real 0m0.139s user 0m0.060s sys 0m0.028s $Yay! Python now runs in just 22 milliseconds, while java uses 139ms. That's 45 and 15 times faster! All your apps get this boost automatically!
Effects of disk cache on file reading
Let's make a big file and see how disk cache affects how fast we can read it. I'm making a 200mb file, but if you have less free ram, you can adjust it.$ echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
3
$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 546 958 0 0 85
-/+ buffers/cache: 461 1043
Swap: 2047 6 2041
$ dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=1M count=200
200+0 records in
200+0 records out
209715200 bytes (210 MB) copied, 6.66191 s, 31.5 MB/s
$ ls -lh bigfile
-rw-r--r-- 1 vidar vidar 200M 2009-04-25 12:30 bigfile
$ free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1504 753 750 0 0 285
-/+ buffers/cache: 468 1036
Swap: 2047 6 2041
$
Since the file was just written, it will go in the disk cache. The 200MB file caused a 200MB bump in "cached". Let's read it, clear the cache, and read it again to see how fast it is:$ time cat bigfile > /dev/null real 0m0.139s user 0m0.008s sys 0m0.128s $ echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches 3 $ time cat bigfile > /dev/null real 0m8.688s user 0m0.020s sys 0m0.336s $That's more than fifty times faster!
Conclusions
The Linux disk cache is very unobtrusive. It uses spare memory to greatly increase disk access speeds, and without taking any memory away from applications. A fully used store of ram on Linux is efficient hardware use, not a warning sign.These pages do simplify a little:
- While newly allocated memory will always (though see point #2) be taken from the disk cache instead of swap, Linux can be configured to preemptively swap out other unused applications in the background to free up memory for cache. The is tunable through the 'swappiness' setting, accessible through /proc/sys/vm/swappiness.
A server might want to swap out unused apps to speed up disk access of running ones (making the system faster), while a desktop system might want to keep apps in memory to prevent lag when the user finally uses them (making the system more responsive). This is the subject of much debate. - Some parts of the cache can't be dropped, not even to accomodate new applications. This includes mmap'd pages that have been mlocked by some application, dirty pages that have not yet been written to storage, and data stored in tmpfs (such as in /dev/shm). The mmap'd, mlocked pages are stuck in the page cache. Dirty pages will for the most part swiftly be written out. Data in tmpfs will be swapped out if possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment